Here’s another in an occasional series in which I feature buildings I see on my travels. The hope is that it will inspire architects, or those who commission their work, to build more beautiful buildings, and actually make the effort to learn the mathematics behind traditional harmony and proportion (as described in Section II of my book The Way of Beauty). My assertion is that, to draw a musical analogy, harmony is the principle of traditional architectural design, while monotony and cacophony are the principles of contemporary architectural design. I give a deeper explanation in a past article, here.
First, the Good - harmony: here are some examples in North Wales, and one from the campus of Princeton University. Then the Bad and Ugly - cacophony - as exemplified by the newly opened New College West in Princeton NJ, which deliberately seeks to depart from the harmonious proportions of the otherwise beautiful neo gothic campus.Here are the restored gothic buildings at St Winifride’s Well in North Wales. This is a pilgrimage site in which, as at Lourdes, people dip into the well water and are cured. It has been a pilgrimage site since the 7th century, when St Winifride was cured miraculously after being decapitated.
These traditional buildings incorporate proportions that are based on musical theory. An indication of this is the design in groups of three, with differing sized windows that relate to each other in visual harmony, just like three notes in a chord. The mathematics that governs the design is comparable to that which governs the frequencies of the notes in a chord.
It is not possible to understand man on the basis of economics alone, nor to define him simply on the basis of class membership. Man is understood in a more complete way when he is situated within the sphere of culture through his language, history, and the position he takes towards the fundamental events of life, such as birth, love, work and death. At the heart of every culture lies the attitude man takes to the greatest mystery: the mystery of God. Different cultures are basically different ways of facing the question of the meaning of personal existence. When this question is eliminated, the culture and moral life of nations are corrupted.The argument as to the whether or not the Gothic style is appropriate or not rests on whether or not one believes that beauty is universal. If it is, and if we accept that the Gothic style is beautiful, then regardless of where or when it originated, it speaks to all people, because it speaks of the source of its inspiration, which is Christ and the Church. This is really what those who commissioned the new building really wanted to avoid - a form that originates in the beauty of God.
The new building illustrates well the maxim that there is no order that is not God’s order, only disorder. Disorder alienates all and connects with no one, and even if functionally sound, in some respects, will disorient people spiritually, and therefore is not fully functional. This is the art and architecture of desolation and a world without God.