The Byrd Festival is Portland, Oregon, continues this week and concludes on Sunday evening with a final concert at St. Stephen's, featuring more selections from Byrd's Gradualia of 1607, sung by Cantores in Ecclesia and directed by Richard Marlow. I have already left Portland so I cannot be there. This post, then, wraps up my live blogging of the events that I was able to attend, and I would like to close with just a few summary comments.
All music before the time of Bach is at a cultural disadvantage given prevailing biases, and in the case of Byrd, the disadvantage is intensified by the extent of his liturgical output. So when Dean Applegate and Richard Marlow set out to create a Byrd Festival more than ten years ago, they were engaged in a heroically implausible effort. It is easy to forget this. When institutions grow and become established, there is a temptation for newcomers to take them for granted, as if they are just supposed to be this way: as if the interest, funding, and talent are just part of the landscape.
The fact is that the very existence of this institution is the product of a dream backed by hard work and dedication, with countless hours of unpaid labor poured into this at every level. Of course it is still underfunded, very much so. It would have been so easy at the beginning of this enterprise or anywhere along the way for the organizers to just observe that there is no real payoff to doing this sort of thing. But they didn't. They keep pressing on, and the audiences and enthusiasm grow year by year.
And why go to all this work? It has to do with the very biases I mentioned above. If Byrd is to assume his rightful place in the history of art, he must have his champions, people who are willing to step out front and let his music be performed or heard. There was a time, we must remember, when Bach himself needed such a champion and Mendelssohn was there to become that, and all generations following are grateful. So too does Byrd need people to step forward and put his music forward so that it can assume its rightful place.
The organizers have done even more than that. They have taken upon themselves the task of showing that this is not only wonderful music but also that it is music that is liturgically viable in our times. To me, this effort is deserving of special praise because Renaissance polyphony itself, though extolled in the documents of Vatican II, has been largely shelved in the postconciliar period, much to the impoverishment of Catholic liturgical music.
So, yes, there are several herculean tasks that this institution has taken on: show the magnificence of Byrd's music, demonstrate its cultural relevance in our times, illustrate its use in liturgy, and provide a setting for the continued cultivation and promotion of polyphonic choral music in worship as performed by the best singers and organists.
So this Byrd Festival has taken many tasks, and they have worked to maintain a good balance between them all. The festival, then, features pure concerts settings for Byrd's organ works and secular and religious songs. They provide choral concerts in which Byrd's liturgical music can be appreciate as pure music. Then also there are the many liturgical service—both Catholic and Anglican—in which it is shown how Byrd's music is eminently suitable to the task of worship. How is it possible that this enormous enterprise can so completely center on the work of a single composer? All I can say is that it works, and that's because Byrd's output is so varied and brilliant it can hold up to this level of focus.
It is a different task from, for example, the CMAA sacred music colloquium. Its purpose is not so much teaching and singing by non-specialists. It is more of a demonstration program to show the riches that Byrd's music has to offer. But the festival organizers have been very kind and wise to hold many receptions following events where enthusiasts can gather and get to know the singers, directors, and each other.
As a result, the organizers have managed the implausible task of creating an institution that has contributed mightily to several sectors: early music enthusiasts, academic musicologists, liturgical scholars, musicians working in the sacred music field, as well as regular people who desire more meaningful worship environments. This is no easy task, but the Byrd Festival has accomplished this. The conference volume A Byrd Festival, edited by Richard Turbet, nicely illustrates the integration of all these goals.
It's not as if music not by Byrd is banned here. And I can easily imagine that in the years ahead, there will be more expansion into other English repertoire from the period and possibly into other regions and traditions as well. There will be an ever greater variety of ensembles taking a role. There will be discussions about format and the problem that in these times, no one can really take off two and half weeks for festival event that is so spread out. There are tradeoffs with any choice about the future, and there are likely to be difficult decisions ahead.
It is important to remember that something as spectacular as this institution comes with no guarantee of perpetuity. Every year, it is something that must be worked for, struggled for, paid for. It is always a leap of faith. It could come to an end the instant that it stops being supported in this way. This cannot be permitted to happen. This is why the Byrd Festival deserves the support of everyone who believes that beauty and truth can find voice in our culture in our times.
Wednesday, August 20, 2008
Byrd Festival: Final Observations
UnknownMore recent articles:
The Third Sunday of Lent 2025Gregory DiPippo
At that time: Jesus was casting out a devil, and the same was dumb: and when he had cast out the devil, the dumb spoke: and the multitudes were in admiration at it: But some of them said: He casteth out devils by Beelzebub, the prince of devils. And others tempting, asked of him a sign from heaven. But he seeing their thoughts, said to them: Every ...
Pictures of Montecassino AbbeyGregory DiPippo
Following up on yesterday’s post of pictures of the crypt of Montecassino Abbey, here are some of the main church and some of the things around it, starting with the most important part of it, the burial site of St Benedict and his sister St Scholastica, behind the high altar.As I am sure our readers know, Montecassino Abbey was heavily bombed duri...
The Prodigal Son in the Liturgy of LentGregory DiPippo
In his commentary on the Gospel of St Matthew, St Jerome writes as follows about the parable of the two sons who are ordered by their father to go and work in the vineyard (21, 28-32). “These are the two sons who are described in Luke’s parable, the frugal (or ‘virtuous’) and the immoderate (or ‘wanton’).” He then connects these two sons with the f...
Another Chant for the Byzantine Liturgy of the PresanctifiedGregory DiPippo
Now the powers of heaven invisibly worship with us, for behold, the King of Glory entereth! Behold, the mystical sacrifice, being perfected, is carried forth in triumph. With faith and love, let us come forth, that we may become partakers of eternal life, Alleluia, Alleluia, Alleluia! (Recording by the Lviv Archeparchial Clergy Choir.) Нині сили ...
The Crypt of Montecassino AbbeyGregory DiPippo
For the feast of St Benedict, here are some pictures of the crypt of the abbey of Montecassino, the site where he ended his days. The crypt was built in the early 16th century, and originally decorated with frescoes, but by the end of the 19th century, these had deteriorated so badly from the humidity that they were deemed unsalvageable. The decisi...
An Interview with Fr Uwe Michael Lang on LiturgyGregory DiPippo
I am sure that our readers will enjoy this interview with the liturgical scholar Fr Uwe Michael Lang of the London Oratory, which was recently published on the YouTube channel of the Totus Tuus Apostolate. It covers a wide range of subjects: Pope Benedict’s teaching on the liturgy, the liturgical abuses in the post-Conciliar period and our own time...
Dives and Lazarus in the Liturgy of LentGregory DiPippo
Before the early eighth century, the church of Rome kept the Thursdays of Lent (with the obvious exception of Holy Thursday) and the Saturdays after Ash Wednesday and Passion Sunday as “aliturgical” days. (The term aliturgical refers, of course, only to the Eucharistic liturgy, not to the Divine Office.) This is attested in the oldest liturgical bo...
The Feast of St Joseph 2025Gregory DiPippo
Truly it is worthy and just... eternal God: Who didst exalt Thy most blessed Confessor Joseph with such great merits of his virtues, that by the wondrous gift of Thy grace, he merited to be made the Spouse of the most holy Virgin Mary, and be thought the father of Thy only-begotten Son, Jesus Christ, our Lord. Wherefore, venerating the day of his b...
Why Should We Build Beautiful Confessionals?Peter Kwasniewski
Confession is a sacrament in which we confess dark deeds, shameful sins, cowardly compromises, repeated rifts. It is something we often wish more to be done with than to do; we know we must go, that it is “good for us” as a visit to the dentist’s or the doctor’s is good for us. It might seem as if the place where we fess up, red-handed, and receive...
Both the Chaos of Jackson Pollock and the Sterility of Photorealism are Incompatible with ChristianityDavid Clayton
Unveiling the middle ground where faith, philosophy, and beauty all meet in the person of Christ, image of the invisible God.Authentic Christian art strikes a balance between abstraction and realism, rejecting the extremes of Abstract Expressionism—where meaning dissolves into unrecognizable chaos—and Photorealism, which reduces reality to soulless...